multiobs

Our Recent Productions

Datasets, working papers, and peer-reviewed articles produced by MultiObs researchers.

Showing 1–2 of 2

  1. Article2026
    Attribution of authorship order and corresponding author in scientific publications: A survey of Brazilian researchers in the Agronomy field(opens in a new tab)

    Vanz, Samile Andréa de Souza; Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini; Docampo, Domingo; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; dos Santos, Silvio Telles; OLIVEIRA, SANDRA C.

    Funded by CNPq, CAPES, FAPERGS, Xunta de Galicia

    This study investigates the perceptions of Brazilian researchers in agronomy regarding the order of authorship and the role of the corresponding author in scientific publications utilizing a survey of 380 responses. Key findings reveal that most researchers see the first author as the primary executor of the research, and the last author as the leader. The study also highlights a significant association between authorship order, research credibility, and citation impact, with differing views based on the type of institutional affiliation. In addition, the survey shows a preference for the corresponding author to be either the first or the last author, emphasizing their role in communication with journals. The results suggest that while the authorship order is crucial for recognizing contributions, the corresponding author’s role is primarily seen as a formality. The study calls for more precise guidelines on authorship practices and further research into authorship dynamics in different scientific fields.

  2. Working Paper2026Open Access
    Exploring the use of funding acknowledgments for mapping global research funding flows(opens in a new tab)

    Ni, Rong; van Honk, Jeroen; Dudek, Jonathan; Ding, Gabrielle; Ràfols, Ismael; Costas, Rodrigo

    Funding acknowledgments (FAs) provide a potential but underexplored source for mapping global research funding flows. This study develops a framework for constructing global funding flow measures using FA data from Dimensions and assesses both the opportunities and limitations of this approach. We compare total and inter-regional funding flows based on funding grant information available in FAs of scientific publications. Our analysis identifies a key limitation arising from collaborative publications, where funding is attributed at the publication level rather than to individual authors. This obscures the interpretation of cross-border funding flows. We show that this attribution structure introduces systematic ambiguity and limits the validity of FA-based analyses. We argue that disaggregated, author-level funding attribution is essential for accurately tracing funding flows. This requires coordinated action among funders, publishers, and researchers, as well as the adoption of more standardized, machine-readable FAs formats.