multiobs

Our Recent Productions

Datasets, working papers, and peer-reviewed articles produced by MultiObs researchers.

Showing 1–5 of 5

  1. Article2026
    Beyond counting tweets: An exploration of scholarly conversations on Twitter(opens in a new tab)

    Shen, Yan; Dudek, Jonathan; Costas, Rodrigo

    Funded by China Scholarship Council

    Academic discussions on Twitter have increased over the past decade. This study analyzes ca. 1.3 million scholarly conversations on Twitter, examining their temporal evolution, topical distribution, and associated publications. The results show a steady growth in the number of scholarly conversations, accompanied by rising proportions of longer and multi‐topic conversations. The visibility of different disciplines and topics varies significantly, with popular themes often closely related to societal events. By comparing topic co‐occurrence networks in Twitter conversations with co‐citation networks in scholarly literature, the study reveals both commonalities and differences in topic structures across academic and non‐academic communication contexts. Moreover, publications that appear in multiple conversations are associated with higher citation counts, suggesting a potential link between conversational engagement and scholarly impact. These findings highlight that the feature of conversations on social media has value not only for refining indicators of scholarly attention and influence beyond simple mention counts, but also to capture more broadly how research is disseminated online.

  2. Article2026
    Attribution of authorship order and corresponding author in scientific publications: A survey of Brazilian researchers in the Agronomy field(opens in a new tab)

    Vanz, Samile Andréa de Souza; Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini; Docampo, Domingo; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida; dos Santos, Silvio Telles; OLIVEIRA, SANDRA C.

    Funded by CNPq, CAPES, FAPERGS, Xunta de Galicia

    This study investigates the perceptions of Brazilian researchers in agronomy regarding the order of authorship and the role of the corresponding author in scientific publications utilizing a survey of 380 responses. Key findings reveal that most researchers see the first author as the primary executor of the research, and the last author as the leader. The study also highlights a significant association between authorship order, research credibility, and citation impact, with differing views based on the type of institutional affiliation. In addition, the survey shows a preference for the corresponding author to be either the first or the last author, emphasizing their role in communication with journals. The results suggest that while the authorship order is crucial for recognizing contributions, the corresponding author’s role is primarily seen as a formality. The study calls for more precise guidelines on authorship practices and further research into authorship dynamics in different scientific fields.

  3. Article2026Open Access
    La dinámica local-global de la circulación del conocimiento en una facultad de ciencias bioquímicas de una universidad pública argentina: aportes para repensar los sistemas de evaluación científica en América Latina(opens in a new tab)

    Cybulski, Larisa E.; Isuani, Gabriela; Sciara, Andrés A.; Pacífico, Fernando Díaz; Pallitto, Nahuel; Beigel, Fernanda

    Since the establishment of the Science Citation Index in the 1960s, scientific evaluation systems have favored metrics like the impact factor (IF), creating a hierarchy that privileges “mainstream” journals while marginalizing local publications. This model has driven Latin American researchers to publish in international journals, often in English and with high article processing charges (APCs), to gain academic recognition and funding. However, this dynamic has undervalued regional journals, despite initiatives like SciELO, RedALyC, and Latindex demonstrating high standards of quality, open access, and increasing internationalization. In response, an interdisciplinary team proposed the creation of a local scientific journal at the Faculty of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences of the National University of Rosario (FBIOyF, by its Spanish acronym), aiming to engage globally without neglecting local values and criteria. To assess this initiative, we conducted a survey among faculty researchers. The results reveal significant interest in a publication that promotes the dissemination of locally generated knowledge, facilitates access for non-English-speaking communities, and fosters interdisciplinary collaborations, making science more equitable and more sensitive to social context.

  4. Article2026Open Access
    Funding, authorship patterns, and citation impact of articles funded by Ukrainian agencies before and during Russia’s full-scale war (2020–2023)(opens in a new tab)

    Hladchenko, Myroslava; Costas, Rodrigo

    Funded by European Commission

    This study explores the funding, authorship patterns, and citation impact of articles funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (MESU), the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NASU), and the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (NRFU). The analysis focuses on articles published in Scopus-indexed journals in 2020–2023. The study findings revealed that the share of articles funded by these agencies increased from 8.6% in 2020–2021 to 11.9% in 2022–2023. Foreign cofunding, international coauthorship, and foreign coaffiliations were consistently associated with higher citation impact. In 2022–2023, foreign coaffiliations had a positive effect on the citation impact of MESU-funded articles, with FNCI exceeding that of articles cofunded by MESU and foreign agencies. In 2020–2021, NASU-funded articles had only a modest advantage in citation impact over unfunded articles. In 2022–2023, this pattern changed, with unfunded articles slightly exceeding NASU-funded articles in overall citation impact. Among articles with foreign coaffiliations and international coauthorship, unfunded articles exhibited a citation advantage over NASU-funded articles, while the citation impact of articles with Ukrainian affiliations was broadly similar. These findings raise questions about the effectiveness of current research evaluation criteria and funding allocation mechanisms and underscore the need for evidence-based reform of Ukraine’s research funding system.

  5. Article2026
    Beyond institutional age and size: what drives innovation-related performance in Brazilian Federal Universities(opens in a new tab)

    Ferrero, Luciane Graziele Pereira; Salles Filho, Sérgio; Bin, Adriana; Cabral, Bernardo Pereira; Rezende, Marcos Candido de Paula

    Funded by FAPESP

    Universities contribute to innovation systems through scientific production, intellectual property protection, technology transfer, and academic–corporate collaboration. Innovation-related outputs depend on combinations of organizational, institutional, and research-related conditions rather than isolated variables. This article examines innovation-related performance in Brazilian federal universities using data from 69 institutions collected by the Brazilian Office of the Comptroller General. The study analyzes intellectual property assets, technology transfer rate, and patent-cited scholarly output through descriptive statistics, correlation analyses, and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The findings show that academic–corporate collaboration is the most consistent condition associated with stronger innovation-related performance. Internal regulation enables intellectual property generation and technology transfer, while field-weighted citation impact is particularly relevant for patent-cited scholarly output. Institutional age is not a linear predictor of innovation-related performance, as younger universities appear prominently in normalized indicators. The article provides configurational evidence from a public higher education system in an emerging economy.