multiobs

Our Recent Productions

Datasets, working papers, and peer-reviewed articles produced by MultiObs researchers.

Showing 1–2 of 2

  1. Conference Paper2026Open Access
    Science for What? Tracing the Functions of Scientific Knowledge in UN Diplomatic Speech(opens in a new tab)

    Penachioni, Júlia Battistuzzi; Pires, Antonio; Bin, Adriana; de Oliveira, Amâncio J; Murat, Biegzat; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.

    This paper examines how scientific knowledge is mobilized within diplomatic discourse in the United Nations General Assembly's Fourth Committee. By combining computational text analysis with qualitative interpretation of 364 meeting transcripts between 2010 and 2023, the research seeks to answer the following question: what functions does scientific knowledge perform in UN diplomatic speech? From our analysis, the answer to this question is that science performs multiple diplomatic functions simultaneously. The findings indicate that science plays a role that is way more complex than simply providing technical information for policymaking. Scientific knowledge is often mobilized to legitimize political positions, reinforce international norms, organize multilateral coordination, support risk governance and preparedness, facilitate access to technologies, and project scientific credibility and international status.

  2. Conference Paper2026Open Access
    Operationalising journals' communication functions through citation patterns and local dimensions(opens in a new tab)

    Di Césare, Victoria; Robinson-García, Nicolás; Costas, Rodrigo

    This preliminary study operationalises the knowledge bridging and gap-filling communication functions of scientific journals, originally proposed by Chavarro et al. (2017). Considering their theoretical definitions, we link these functions to our local research framework (Di Césare & Robinson-Garcia, 2026) through the producers and recipients dimensions, and measure them using local or global references and citations drawn from OpenAlex articles. We aim to empirically identify knowledge bridging and gap-filling journals, both within and outside the mainstream. The results suggest that the vast majority of these journals are non-mainstream. The thematic profiles of their references and citations validate our geographical operationalisations. Gap-filling journals belong predominantly to the non-mainstream local Social Sciences, whereas in the non-mainstream knowledge bridging journals, the Health Sciences emerge. These domain-level findings support the journals' theoretical functions of serving, respectively, as venues for the publication of knowledge overlooked by the mainstream, and as bridges between mainstream knowledge and local communities.